Name | Type | Posted | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
SAWS Industry Day 2 Questions and Answers.pdf | Jun 10, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0016_Factor 3 Price Matrix (2).xlsx | XLSX | Jun 9, 2026 | |
Attachment 0005_General Specification for PdL-SAWS Mortar Ammunition 24 April 2026.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0004_General Specification for PdL-SAWS Small Caliber Ammunition 24 April2026.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0007_General Specification for PdL-SAWS Mortar Weapons 24 April2026.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0003_General Specification for PdL-SAWS General Ammunition 24 April 2026.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0009 - Cross-Reference Matrix DRAFT.xlsx | XLSX | Jun 9, 2026 | |
Attachment 0008_HTRO Self-Score Matrix.xlsx | XLSX | Jun 9, 2026 | |
Attachment 0018 - Ammunition and Explosives Suppliers.XLSX | XLSX | Jun 9, 2026 | |
Questions/Feedback | LINK | Jun 9, 2026 | |
Attachment 0017_SAWS Safety SOW 23 Feb 2026 -Draft.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0023_Certification of Compliance with Prohibited Sources.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0024_Alternate Country List.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0015_Security SOW SRC I - IV_06 Feb 2026 Draft.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0001_SAWS Tailored Federal Supply Classification (FSC) Item List.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0006_General Specification for PdL-SAWS Rocket Propelled and Spin Stabilized Grenades 24 April 2026 (2).pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
SAWS RFP W519TC26RA036_DRAFT 3.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 | ||
Attachment 0002_SAWS IDIQ SOW 13 February 2026 Draft.pdf | Jun 9, 2026 |
W519TC26RA036 - Special Ammunition and Weapon Systems (SAWS) - Draft Solicitation
Army Contracting Command-Rock Island (ACC-RI) is finalizing the acquisition strategy for the Special Ammunition and Weapon Systems (SAWS) and Non-NATO Commercial Ammunition program. This third draft solicitation incorporates feedback from industry sessions held in March and May 2026. The Army is using this version to refine technical requirements and the HTRO evaluation thresholds before issuing a formal Request for Proposal. The procurement covers non-NATO small caliber, mortar, and rocket-propelled grenades via up to five Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts. The acquisition uses a Highest Technically Rated Offeror (HTRO) methodology, requiring a self-score across eight technical categories. Feedback on the 80% Minimum Technical Threshold Rating (MTTR) and documentation requirements is due by June 15, 2026. The strategy involves up to five FFP IDIQ contracts for non-NATO ammunition and weapons, including new production and surplus. The SAWS program procures non-NATO standard ammunition and weapon systems through up to five FFP IDIQ contracts.
Generated by Lumen AI
Scoped analysis and attachments—go beyond the summary when you need detail from the solicitation package.
Contact and place of performance
Logan Frye
Not specified
Edited 7/10/2026 to include SAWS Industry Day Questions and Answers attachment. ____________________________________________________________________ This posting announces the release of Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) #3 for the Special Ammunition and Weapon Systems (SAWS) and Non-NATO Commercial Ammunition acquisition. This third and final draft serves as a direct update to the initial versions posted on March 17,...
View moreThroughout the provided documentation, the terms Request for Proposal and solicitation are used synonymously and interchangeably. Furthermore, unless a specific provision states otherwise, any references to the number of days for submissions or contractual requirements refer to calendar days rather than business days. This approach ensures a standard timeline for all participants as the government moves toward the release of the formal solicitation.
The USG is seeking feedback on the following questionnaire regarding Draft RFP #3 to ensure its effectiveness:
1. The Minimum Technical Threshold Rating (MTTR) is currently set at 80% of the total possible points. Based on your company's experience, would you realistically be able to meet the 80% MTTR? Which categories or specific line items present the most significant challenges to achieving that score?
2. The HTRO Matrix identifies specific types of documentation as proof. Are there alternative work samples or forms of evidence that you believe would also be strong indicators of capability for these categories?
Any additional questions and feedback in addition to the questions/statements provided above and regarding this Draft RFP shall be submitted to the following USG Contracting Representatives:
• Logan Frye, Contract Specialist, Email: [email protected]
• Bethany Carbajal, Contracting Officer, Email: [email protected]